forum.vdsworld.com Forum Index forum.vdsworld.com
Visit VDSWORLD.com
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


64 bit soft

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    forum.vdsworld.com Forum Index -> General Help
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
filip
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 340

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:27 am    Post subject: 64 bit soft Reply with quote

Next generation Windows codename Longhorn will be 64bit only
They will still run 32bit stuff i hope

http://www.tcmagazine.info/

What about VDS on 64bit code ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jules
Professional Member
Professional Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2001
Posts: 1043
Location: Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

VDS is written in Delphi, and even the latest Delphi 2005 (which I have here) is still a 32-bit compiler. However, it really shouldn't make much difference to VDS since it is basically a string processing engine. VDS 6 will have the capability to handle 64-bit integer values, which would obviously be handled faster on a 64-bit processor running 64-bit code, but most of the processing time is converting numbers to and from strings. If it's speed you're after, use a language that compiles your program into binary code.
_________________
The Tech Pro
www.tech-pro.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GeoTrail
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Location: Bergen, Norway

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:16 pm    Post subject: Re: 64 bit soft Reply with quote

filip wrote:
Next generation Windows codename Longhorn will be 64bit only
They will still run 32bit stuff i hope

http://www.tcmagazine.info/

What about VDS on 64bit code ?
That is NOT true.
The 64 bit version will be ment for server systems, and the 32 bit version will still be ment for the home user market.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
PGWARE
Web Host


Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 1567

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Geotrail is 100% correct. Microsoft would not shoot themselves in the foot by making people upgrade hardware to upgrade to the latest windows (although you pretty much have to anyway Wink). They want users to be able to upgrade Windows in a simple process thus making more $ for them. Although that would help hardware makers MS would/could lose tons of sales by forcing substantial hardware upgrades.

MS is makign a 64 bit version for the desktop as well, they plan on transitioning everyone off of 32 bit to 64 bit. But 32 bit applications will be supported indefinately on the 64 bit systems.

Article on 32/64 bit longhorn: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/05/06/HNlonghorneditions_1.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
filip
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 340

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

from http://www.tcmagazine.info/ site
READ Longhorn to be 64Bit only, no 32Bit

Posted by: Michiel on Nov 17, 2004 - 04:54 PM

Microsoft is currently busy working on its latest flagship operating system codename Longhorn, but for those running 32Bit hardware you may be left out when the OS is finally released.

According to sources, Microsoft Windows Longhorn will only be available for 64Bit processors and not for 32Bit. The pure reason why MS would only compile a 64Bit and not swing both ways is rather unclear at the moment. We can only speculate that since Longhorn has a few years till its official unveiling, Microsoft thinks that by that time 64Bit will be the norm and 32Bit would have fazed out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GeoTrail
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Location: Bergen, Norway

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes it is true you can't run the 64 bit version on a 32 bit based system such as P4 or Athlon XP. But trust me, the 32 bit version will be launched right before the 64 bit version which will be launched to their commercial customers and partners first Wink

If you don't believe me, lets make a bet. You name the $ and I'm in Wink

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
filip
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 340

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the year 2006 will be dual core CPUs running 64bit with compatibility to 32bit.

So Microsoft will make an evolution step with longhorn
i dont see any point supporting pure 32bit hardware

Intel stop rising CPU clock at 3.8 GHz...

BTX design system will come...

There is no point buying a new PC at this time or the next year...if you have a GHz PC in use now...


Last edited by filip on Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:36 pm; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jules
Professional Member
Professional Member


Joined: 14 Sep 2001
Posts: 1043
Location: Cumbria, UK

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the article is right. Longhorn will be 64-bit only, but it will run 32-bit apps. If you have a 32-bit processor you will have to use Windows XP. It's probably a lot more work for Microsoft to create a 32-bit version of a 64-bit OS, and it's hardly worth it if 64-bit CPUs will be obsolete by the time it comes out. Many of the 32-bit CPUs probably won't have enough power to run the new OS anyway.
_________________
The Tech Pro
www.tech-pro.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GeoTrail
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Location: Bergen, Norway

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jules, check out the source of the article and tell me you trust that.
Anyways, the bet is still on if anyone wants apart if it Smile

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
PGWARE
Web Host


Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 1567

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay whoever wants to bet $1000 that Longhorn will come in a 32bit version I'm up for that bet because IT WILL.

Proof:


From: http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/windows/story/0,10801,92990,00.html

Quote:
Microsoft also plans to release versions of Longhorn for Itanium and 64-bit extended systems as well as a 32-bit edition, according to Greg Sullivan, a lead product manager for Windows.


From:
http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?action=crf&category=main&cid=217781&id=19734

Editions available to download for MSDN subscribers:
Quote:

WinHEC 2004 Build (4074):
Customer Support and Diagnostics Tools for Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 (English)
Developers Kit for Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 (English)
Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 32-Bit Professional Edition (English)
Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 32-Bit Professional Edition Checked Build (English)

Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 64-Bit Edition (English)
Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 64-Bit Edition Checked Build (English)
Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 64-Bit Extended Systems Edition (English)
Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 64-Bit Extended Systems Edition Checked Build (English)



From: http://msmvps.com/richardgrimes/archive/2004/05/09/6141.aspx

He talks about downloading the 32-bit edition
Quote:

I downloaded Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 - 32 Bit Professional Edition (734Mb), Customer Support and Diagnostics Tools for Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 (770Mb) and Windows Longhorn Client Preview 2 SDK (709Mb). I extracted each of these to hard disk using the Virtual CD-ROM device as explained above. First I installed Longhorn, then I booted to Longhorn and installed the symbols.



Finally direct from Microsoft:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/Longhorn/Support/lhdevfaq/

Quote:

How do I install the PDC Longhorn?

Once you choose where to install Longhorn, mount the appropriate Longhorn *.iso file from Longhorn DVD Disc 2 and run the setup. There are *.iso files for different processors (x86, x64 and IA64), in checked and unchecked versions




Quote:
What are the hardware requirements going to be for Longhorn?

End User Desktop Minimum System Requirements. Pentium III 800 MHz or equivalent. 256 MB RAM. Graphics: GPU: Dx7 support. Display: Minimum resolution of 1024x768, at 32 bits per pixel. VRAM: 32MB at minimum resolution.



It's unlikely Microsoft is creating a 32 bit version of Longhorn just for fun or to waste their own time. They clearly are creating versions of itanium, 64 bit and x86 (32-bit) processors. Also MS clearly states that the minimum sys requires to run the preview version of Longhorn requires at minimum at Pentium 3 800 Mhz - obviously that cpu is NOT a 64 bit chip.

Microsoft is not stupid, they realize tons of IT managers and businesses are still running 32 bit; they have had a hard enough time getting people to move from Windows 98 to Windows XP. Do you really think they will shoot themselves in the foot by trying to force these busineses to upgrade hardware and software? I think not.


Okay so shall I email you may paypal account information or shall you contact me to discuss payment arrangements?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShinobiSoft
Professional Member
Professional Member


Joined: 06 Nov 2002
Posts: 790
Location: Knoxville, Tn

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 7:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't want to claim that I have spent any amount of time researching the
new 64 bit platform because I haven't, but I felt it necessary to put forth
my two cents.

How many years has it been since the intorduction of Windows 95, about
10 years right? Prior to that all we had was a 16 bit OS. To this day I can
still write 16 bit applications that run on 32 bit machines. Why would
anyone think that just because we're moving up to a 64 bit platform that
the 32 bit apps won't work? Anyone with this notion is severly mistaken.

There will always be a reverse compatibility issue, no matter what kind of
new OSs are introduced, etc. Matter of factly, even though I run a 32 bit
machine, I'm still capable of developing 64 bit software although I can't
test the software.

My two cents...

_________________
Bill Weckel
ShinobiSoft Software

"The way is known to all, but not all know it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
GeoTrail
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Location: Bergen, Norway

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can also get Windows 2003 64 bit as well as 32 bit. There is a difference between 32 bit compatibility and 32 bit OS.

I've been using Longhorn with currently updated builds since early 2003. As far as I know, the 32 bit version will be the priority as the 64 bit version will be released later on after the 32 bit version has been tested in real-time enviroments. They did the same thing with the 2003 Server edition aswell.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
PGWARE
Web Host


Joined: 29 Dec 2001
Posts: 1567

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm fairly certain 16 bit application compatibility has been completely removed from Longhorn, thus being able to run those apps on Longhorn is no longer possible.

Eventually MS will do the same for 32 bit apps, but it will take some time - persumably when the hardware has expanded beyong the point that current 32 bit hardware supported - (over 4 gb cpu, over 2 gb ram).

MS needed a buffer/transition between 64 bit and 32 bit OS, Longhorn will be that transition. During that time all cpu manufacturers will only be producing new 64 bit chips - thus all new pc's will be running Longhorn 64 bit.

MS probably will not develop another 32 bit OS after Longhorn, they prolly want the public to transition over to the 64 bit hardware while Longhorn will be out for a few years. I suspect 32 bit OS's will not be developed after the Longhorn OS is finished and MS will tell users who want to upgrade to the new OS that they will need new hardware as well.

By that time it will be well around 2010.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GeoTrail
Valued Contributor
Valued Contributor


Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Location: Bergen, Norway

PostPosted: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your presumptions are pretty correct PGWARE. But, there is a way of running 16 bit apps in Longhorn. It just needs abit more fiddling as with DOS protected apps on XP. But it does work. Also, there might be an emulator out soon Wink which will not only enable true 32 bit apps to run on the new 64 bit hardware and OS, but also 16 bit apps aswell. This is because many military branches, beleive it or not, still use those apps.

As far as I know as of now, there are not planned any SP style updates after the release of codename Longhorn, but only individual update releases. That is not definate, but what I've heard from someone not involved in the development departments.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    forum.vdsworld.com Forum Index -> General Help All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

Twitter@vdsworld       RSS

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group